There's nothing like letting the flowers do the talking. Here we are, September 21st 2008 and we have a couple of scapes with flowers, nice, rich, dark coloured purple flowers. And they really are a little on the dark side for 'Lancifolia' seeing as all the pictures I have seen of its flowers tend to be quite a bit lighter in overall colour. That points to the distinct possibility that what we have here may well prove to cathayana and I want to make sure that I put this plant and 'Chinese Sunrise' next to each other so we can easily compare blooming periods and flower colour. 'Chinese Sunrise' is apparently a sport of cathayana so if nothing else the blooming period should overlap.

Something's not quite right here though in as much as the 'Chinese Sunrise' I have shows a different leaf from what this one is. This one's narrower in the leaf, same number of veins and there is none of the slight waviness to the leaf you see in 'Chinese Sunrise'. This puzzle is not solved as yet.

And this puzzle wasn't solved until I looked closer and took this picture. There are 3 new offsets in this pot, and they are all nudging the edge of the pot, two on the left side and one on the back side. That sort of growth would tend to indicate a stoloniferous growth behaviour and that is what lead me to taking a closer look at the details provided for this species in the Hosta Library. The listing for clausa var. normalis shows only two pictures and the one of the plant looks like a spitting image of mine, the one with the flowers in it look a little paler than what mine are. Bob Axmear says in the Library that

'It looks a little like 'Lancifolia' and is often mistaken for it. According to Schmid it propagates by seed and creeping root stocks, although Diana Grenfell says that it is less stoloniferous than clausa. Grenfell describes it as needing rich soil and plenty of water. The two plants are often confused in the trade,'

That last line does make me feel better about the misidentification, doesn't sound like I was the first one to have made this mistake, and I won't be the last either. The reference to this being 'less stoloniferous than clausa' is with regard to clausa var. clausa which apparently does flower but the flowers never open up, so they cannot be pollinated and therefor relies strictly on root propagation.

According to my brother Chris, who gave me this, what I received came from a sizable stand of it from a friend of his who'd received it as a NOID about 20 odd years ago, he's very happy to be able to put a name to it finally. BTW, look at the clearly stoloniferous growth out the drainage hole in this 2 gallon pot...

It's now February 21, 2010, and yes, it's been a VERY mild winter, to the point where one of the divisions is already unfurling its leaves!

Other Hostas, like ''Invincible' for example, are close to the same stage, but they suffered some frost damage one night that week, whereas this one did not. Even with plants, location matters, I guess. I believe this is the same plant you see right above, and it's a perfect example of how vigorous this specie is.